Screener
MNBD vs FCOR
ALPS Intermediate Municipal Bond ETF vs Fidelity Corporate Bond ETF
Key differences
- FCOR costs 0.08% less per year.
- FCOR is significantly larger than MNBD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MNBD follows a active selection strategy; FCOR uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, FCOR has delivered higher annualized returns.
- FCOR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MNBD | FCOR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.44% | 0.36% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $55M | $339M |
| Since | 2022 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 3.33% | 4.55% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.8% | +6.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.0% | +5.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +0.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.13 | 0.35 |
| Volatility 1Y | 2.47% | 4.44% |
| Max drawdown | -5.89% | -22.60% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MNBD and FCOR
Explore further