Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

MOO vs BUZZ

VanEck Agribusiness ETF vs VanEck Social Sentiment ETF

MOO

VanEck Agribusiness ETF

VanEck

Annual cost

0.56%

Fund size

$1.2B

BUZZ

VanEck Social Sentiment ETF

VanEck

Annual cost

0.76%

Fund size

$100M

Key differences

  • MOO costs 0.20% less per year.
  • MOO is significantly larger than BUZZ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last 3 years, BUZZ has delivered higher annualized returns.
  • MOO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

MOOBUZZ
Annual cost (TER)0.56%0.76%
Fund size (AUM)$1.2B$100M
Since20072021
Dividend yield2.15%0.00%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth america
Strategyindex trackingindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+14.3%+42.3%
CAGR 3Y+2.5%+37.5%
CAGR 5Y-0.6%+10.5%
Sharpe 3Y0.011.09
Volatility 1Y13.89%31.21%
Max drawdown-39.52%-56.87%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to MOO and BUZZ