Screener
MOO vs LFEQ
VanEck Agribusiness ETF vs VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF
Key differences
- MOO is significantly larger than LFEQ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MOO is classified as equity, while LFEQ is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- MOO follows a index tracking strategy; LFEQ uses tactical allocation.
- Over the last 3 years, LFEQ has delivered higher annualized returns.
- MOO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MOO | LFEQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.56% | 0.58% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.2B | $29M |
| Since | 2007 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 2.15% | 0.86% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | tactical allocation |
| CAGR 1Y | +14.3% | +28.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +2.5% | +19.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | -0.6% | +10.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.01 | 1.03 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.89% | 12.13% |
| Max drawdown | -39.52% | -35.19% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MOO and LFEQ
Explore further