Skip to content
Screener

MOOD vs FFLS

Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF vs The Future Fund Long/Short ETF

MOOD

Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF

Annual cost

0.73%

Fund size

$143M

FFLS

The Future Fund Long/Short ETF

Annual cost

1.60%

Fund size

$43M

Key differences

Both MOOD and FFLS are alternative ETFs. MOOD charges 0.73% a year and FFLS 1.60%. The main difference: MOOD follows a tactical allocation strategy; FFLS uses long short.

  • MOOD follows a tactical allocation strategy; FFLS uses long short.
  • MOOD costs 0.87% less per year.
  • MOOD is much larger than FFLS. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.

Side-by-side comparison

MOODFFLS
Annual cost (TER)0.73%1.60%
Fund size (AUM)$143M$43M
Since20222023
Dividend yield0.35%0.12%
Asset classalternativealternative
Regionnorth america
Strategytactical allocationlong short
CAGR 1Y+34.3%-4.2%
CAGR 3Y+20.6%N/A
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3Y1.43N/A
Volatility 1Y14.49%9.33%
Max drawdown-14.34%-11.05%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to MOOD and FFLS