Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

MOOD vs RHRX

Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF vs RH Tactical Rotation ETF

MOOD

Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF

Relative Sentiment

Annual cost

0.73%

Fund size

$116M

RHRX

RH Tactical Rotation ETF

Adaptive ETF

Annual cost

1.38%

Fund size

$34M

Key differences

  • MOOD costs 0.65% less per year.
  • MOOD is significantly larger than RHRX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • MOOD is classified as mixed asset, while RHRX is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
  • MOOD follows a active selection strategy; RHRX uses option income.
  • Over the last 3 years, RHRX has delivered higher annualized returns.
  • RHRX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

MOODRHRX
Annual cost (TER)0.73%1.38%
Fund size (AUM)$116M$34M
Since20222012
Dividend yield0.36%0.00%
Asset classmixed assetalternative
Regionnorth america
Strategyactive selectionoption income
CAGR 1Y+36.9%+39.5%
CAGR 3Y+20.3%+22.4%
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3Y1.431.09
Volatility 1Y14.13%13.26%
Max drawdown-14.34%-25.33%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to MOOD and RHRX