Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

MOTO vs EMOP

Guinness Atkinson Smart Transportation & Technology ETF vs AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF

MOTO

Guinness Atkinson Smart Transportation & Technology ETF

Annual cost

0.68%

Fund size

$10M

EMOP

AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF

Annual cost

0.70%

Fund size

$1.9B

Key differences

  • EMOP is significantly larger than MOTO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • EMOP has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

MOTOEMOP
Annual cost (TER)0.68%0.70%
Fund size (AUM)$10M$1.9B
Since20191995
Dividend yield0.86%1.64%
Asset classequityequity
Region
Strategyactive selectionactive selection
CAGR 1Y+56.6%N/A
CAGR 3Y+21.7%N/A
CAGR 5Y+11.5%N/A
Sharpe 3Y0.84N/A
Volatility 1Y21.11%
Max drawdown-38.24%-12.87%

Similar to MOTO and EMOP