Screener
MOTO vs FNDA
Guinness Atkinson Smart Transportation & Technology ETF vs Schwab Fundamental U.S. Small Company ETF
Key differences
- FNDA costs 0.43% less per year.
- FNDA is significantly larger than MOTO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MOTO follows a active selection strategy; FNDA uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, MOTO has delivered higher annualized returns.
- FNDA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MOTO | FNDA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.68% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $10M | $10.2B |
| Since | 2019 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 0.86% | 1.10% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +56.6% | +34.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.7% | +17.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.5% | +8.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.84 | 0.72 |
| Volatility 1Y | 21.11% | 17.28% |
| Max drawdown | -38.24% | -44.64% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MOTO and FNDA
Explore further