Screener
MOTO vs FNDC
Guinness Atkinson Smart Transportation & Technology ETF vs Schwab Fundamental International Small Equity ETF
Key differences
- FNDC costs 0.29% less per year.
- FNDC is significantly larger than MOTO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MOTO follows a active selection strategy; FNDC uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, MOTO has delivered higher annualized returns.
- FNDC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MOTO | FNDC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.68% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $10M | $3.3B |
| Since | 2019 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 0.86% | 3.48% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +56.6% | +30.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.7% | +18.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.5% | +8.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.84 | 0.97 |
| Volatility 1Y | 21.11% | 14.29% |
| Max drawdown | -38.24% | -43.22% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MOTO and FNDC
Explore further