Screener
MOTO vs FNDF
Guinness Atkinson Smart Transportation & Technology ETF vs Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF
Key differences
- FNDF costs 0.43% less per year.
- FNDF is significantly larger than MOTO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MOTO follows a active selection strategy; FNDF uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, FNDF has delivered higher annualized returns.
- FNDF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MOTO | FNDF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.68% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $10M | $23.1B |
| Since | 2019 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 0.86% | 3.01% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global ex us |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +56.6% | +44.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.7% | +23.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.5% | +13.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.84 | 1.24 |
| Volatility 1Y | 21.11% | 15.12% |
| Max drawdown | -38.24% | -40.14% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MOTO and FNDF
Explore further