Screener
MOTO vs IDRV
Guinness Atkinson Smart Transportation & Technology ETF vs iShares Self-Driving EV and Tech ETF
Key differences
- IDRV costs 0.20% less per year.
- IDRV is significantly larger than MOTO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MOTO follows a active selection strategy; IDRV uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, MOTO has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| MOTO | IDRV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.68% | 0.48% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $10M | $161M |
| Since | 2019 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 0.86% | 1.48% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +56.6% | +45.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.7% | +7.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.5% | +1.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.84 | 0.28 |
| Volatility 1Y | 21.11% | 24.73% |
| Max drawdown | -38.24% | -53.00% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MOTO and IDRV
Explore further