Screener
MOTO vs IVRS
Guinness Atkinson Smart Transportation & Technology ETF vs iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF
Key differences
- IVRS costs 0.21% less per year.
- MOTO follows a active selection strategy; IVRS uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, MOTO has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| MOTO | IVRS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.68% | 0.47% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $10M | $8M |
| Since | 2019 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 0.86% | 0.28% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +56.6% | +2.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.7% | +11.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.84 | 0.46 |
| Volatility 1Y | 21.11% | 21.71% |
| Max drawdown | -38.24% | -31.43% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MOTO and IVRS
Explore further