Screener
MOTO vs TCHP
Guinness Atkinson Smart Transportation & Technology ETF vs T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF
Key differences
- TCHP costs 0.11% less per year.
- TCHP is significantly larger than MOTO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MOTO follows a active selection strategy; TCHP uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, TCHP has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| MOTO | TCHP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.68% | 0.57% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $10M | $2.1B |
| Since | 2019 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 0.86% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +56.6% | +25.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.7% | +26.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.5% | +12.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.84 | 1.10 |
| Volatility 1Y | 21.11% | 16.19% |
| Max drawdown | -38.24% | -42.34% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MOTO and TCHP
Explore further