Screener
MOTO vs TGRW
Guinness Atkinson Smart Transportation & Technology ETF vs T. Rowe Price Growth Stock ETF
Key differences
- TGRW costs 0.16% less per year.
- TGRW is significantly larger than MOTO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, TGRW has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| MOTO | TGRW | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.68% | 0.52% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $10M | $972M |
| Since | 2019 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 0.86% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +56.6% | +24.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.7% | +23.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.5% | +10.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.84 | 1.00 |
| Volatility 1Y | 21.11% | 16.60% |
| Max drawdown | -38.24% | -43.33% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MOTO and TGRW
Explore further