Screener
MPLY vs NLR
Monopoly ETF vs VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF
Key differences
- NLR costs 0.27% less per year.
- NLR is significantly larger than MPLY — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MPLY covers global markets; NLR covers north america.
- MPLY follows a active selection strategy; NLR uses index tracking.
- NLR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MPLY | NLR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.52% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $13M | $5.1B |
| Since | 2025 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | — | 2.19% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +34.7% | +40.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +36.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +22.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.98 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.18% | 41.97% |
| Max drawdown | -13.46% | -34.35% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MPLY and NLR
Explore further