Screener
MPRO vs CGUS
Monarch ProCap ETF vs Capital Group Core Equity ETF
Key differences
- CGUS costs 0.74% less per year.
- CGUS is significantly larger than MPRO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MPRO is classified as mixed asset, while CGUS is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- MPRO follows a index tracking strategy; CGUS uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, CGUS has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| MPRO | CGUS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.07% | 0.33% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $253M | $10.3B |
| Since | 2021 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 1.89% | 0.90% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +14.7% | +27.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +10.3% | +23.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.7% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.82 | 1.27 |
| Volatility 1Y | 6.68% | 12.50% |
| Max drawdown | -14.50% | -22.15% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MPRO and CGUS
Explore further