Screener
MPRO vs FDRS
Monarch ProCap ETF vs Corgi ETF Trust I
Key differences
- FDRS costs 0.58% less per year.
- MPRO is significantly larger than FDRS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MPRO is classified as mixed asset, while FDRS is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- MPRO follows a index tracking strategy; FDRS uses leveraged.
Side-by-side comparison
| MPRO | FDRS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.07% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $253M | $77M |
| Since | 2021 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 1.89% | — |
| Asset class | mixed asset | alternative |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | leveraged |
| CAGR 1Y | +14.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +10.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.7% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.82 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 6.68% | — |
| Max drawdown | -14.50% | -21.64% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MPRO and FDRS
Explore further