Screener
MSMR vs AAXJ
McElhenny Sheffield Managed Risk ETF vs iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex Japan ETF
Key differences
- AAXJ costs 0.34% less per year.
- AAXJ is significantly larger than MSMR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MSMR covers north america markets; AAXJ covers asia pacific.
- MSMR follows a active selection strategy; AAXJ uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, AAXJ has delivered higher annualized returns.
- AAXJ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MSMR | AAXJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.06% | 0.72% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $166M | $3.8B |
| Since | 2021 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 1.88% | 1.54% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | asia pacific |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +26.0% | +53.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +19.8% | +23.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.35 | 1.04 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.02% | 20.13% |
| Max drawdown | -14.86% | -44.52% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MSMR and AAXJ
Explore further