Screener
AAXJ vs EEMA
iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex Japan ETF vs iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF
Key differences
- EEMA costs 0.23% less per year.
- AAXJ covers asia pacific markets; EEMA covers emerging markets.
Side-by-side comparison
| AAXJ | EEMA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.72% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3.8B | $1.3B |
| Since | 2008 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 1.54% | 1.28% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +48.0% | +46.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.3% | +22.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.8% | +7.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.97 | 0.95 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.80% | 19.95% |
| Max drawdown | -44.52% | -44.18% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to AAXJ and EEMA
Explore further