Screener
MSMR vs MATE
McElhenny Sheffield Managed Risk ETF vs Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF
Key differences
- MATE costs 0.09% less per year.
- MSMR is significantly larger than MATE — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MSMR is classified as equity, while MATE is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- MSMR covers north america markets; MATE covers emerging markets.
- MSMR follows a active selection strategy; MATE uses tactical allocation.
Side-by-side comparison
| MSMR | MATE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.06% | 0.97% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $166M | $37M |
| Since | 2021 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 1.88% | — |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | emerging markets |
| Strategy | active selection | tactical allocation |
| CAGR 1Y | +26.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +19.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.35 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.02% | — |
| Max drawdown | -14.86% | -13.24% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MSMR and MATE
Explore further