Screener
MSTQ vs FDAT
LHA Market State Tactical Q ETF vs Tactical Advantage ETF
Key differences
MSTQ is an alternative ETF, while FDAT is a fixed income ETF. MSTQ charges 1.55% a year and FDAT 0.78%.
- MSTQ is an alternative fund, while FDAT is a fixed income fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- MSTQ follows a option income strategy; FDAT uses tactical allocation.
- FDAT costs 0.77% less per year.
- Over the last three years, MSTQ has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| MSTQ | FDAT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.55% | 0.78% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $39M | $36M |
| Since | 2022 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 0.65% | 5.63% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | tactical allocation |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.0% | +10.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +23.5% | +8.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.14 | 0.54 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.40% | 10.36% |
| Max drawdown | -31.05% | -8.20% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.