Screener
MTBA vs IMTG
Simplify MBS ETF vs Invesco Agency MBS ETF
Key differences
- MTBA costs 0.07% less per year.
- MTBA is significantly larger than IMTG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MTBA is classified as alternative, while IMTG is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- MTBA follows a multi strategy strategy; IMTG uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| MTBA | IMTG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.22% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.7B | $15M |
| Since | 2023 | 2026 |
| Dividend yield | 5.53% | — |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | multi strategy | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.11% | — |
| Max drawdown | -3.48% | -2.86% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MTBA and IMTG
Explore further