Screener
MTBA vs MBB
Simplify MBS ETF vs iShares MBS ETF
Key differences
- MBB costs 0.11% less per year.
- MBB is significantly larger than MTBA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MTBA is classified as alternative, while MBB is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- MTBA follows a multi strategy strategy; MBB uses index tracking.
- MBB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MTBA | MBB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.04% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.7B | $38.3B |
| Since | 2023 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 5.53% | 4.23% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | multi strategy | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.5% | +7.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +4.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +0.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.11 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.11% | 4.54% |
| Max drawdown | -3.48% | -17.65% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MTBA and MBB
Explore further