Screener
MTRA vs DGRO
Invesco International Growth Focus ETF vs iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
Key differences
- DGRO costs 0.46% less per year.
- DGRO is significantly larger than MTRA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MTRA follows a active selection strategy; DGRO uses index tracking.
- DGRO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MTRA | DGRO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.54% | 0.08% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $142M | $39.6B |
| Since | 2025 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | — | 2.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +24.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +16.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +10.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.08 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 9.59% |
| Max drawdown | -15.77% | -35.10% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MTRA and DGRO
Explore further