Screener
MTRA vs IUSG
Invesco International Growth Focus ETF vs iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF
Key differences
- IUSG costs 0.50% less per year.
- IUSG is significantly larger than MTRA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MTRA follows a active selection strategy; IUSG uses index tracking.
- IUSG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MTRA | IUSG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.54% | 0.04% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $142M | $30.1B |
| Since | 2025 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.51% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +36.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +28.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +16.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.24 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 15.83% |
| Max drawdown | -15.77% | -32.35% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MTRA and IUSG
Explore further