Screener
MTRA vs ICLN
Invesco International Growth Focus ETF vs iShares Global Clean Energy ETF
Key differences
- ICLN costs 0.15% less per year.
- ICLN is significantly larger than MTRA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MTRA follows a active selection strategy; ICLN uses index tracking.
- ICLN has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MTRA | ICLN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.54% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $142M | $2.5B |
| Since | 2025 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.30% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +87.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +9.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +2.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.34 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 25.93% |
| Max drawdown | -15.77% | -66.75% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MTRA and ICLN
Explore further