Screener
MTRA vs PBD
Invesco International Growth Focus ETF vs Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF
Key differences
- MTRA costs 0.21% less per year.
- MTRA follows a active selection strategy; PBD uses index tracking.
- PBD has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MTRA | PBD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.54% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $142M | $208M |
| Since | 2025 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.74% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +95.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +9.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -2.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.33 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 23.36% |
| Max drawdown | -15.77% | -75.44% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MTRA and PBD
Explore further