Screener
MTRA vs IWY
Invesco International Growth Focus ETF vs iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF
Key differences
- IWY costs 0.34% less per year.
- IWY is significantly larger than MTRA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MTRA follows a active selection strategy; IWY uses index tracking.
- IWY has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MTRA | IWY | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.54% | 0.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $142M | $16.5B |
| Since | 2025 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.35% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +30.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +27.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +17.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.15 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 15.60% |
| Max drawdown | -15.77% | -32.68% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MTRA and IWY
Explore further