Screener
MTRA vs OMFS
Invesco International Growth Focus ETF vs Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF
Key differences
- OMFS costs 0.15% less per year.
- MTRA follows a active selection strategy; OMFS uses index enhanced.
- OMFS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MTRA | OMFS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.54% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $142M | $275M |
| Since | 2025 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.93% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index enhanced |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +33.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +15.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +6.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.65 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 17.69% |
| Max drawdown | -15.77% | -42.50% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MTRA and OMFS
Explore further