Screener
OMFS vs IMFL
Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF vs Invesco International Developed Dynamic Multifactor ETF
Key differences
- IMFL is significantly larger than OMFS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- OMFS covers north america markets; IMFL covers global.
- OMFS follows a index enhanced strategy; IMFL uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| OMFS | IMFL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.34% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $275M | $957M |
| Since | 2017 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 0.93% | 3.02% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index enhanced | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +30.6% | +32.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +15.4% | +16.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.2% | +8.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.63 | 0.82 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.63% | 15.75% |
| Max drawdown | -42.50% | -33.25% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to OMFS and IMFL
Explore further