Screener
MTRA vs SPGP
Invesco International Growth Focus ETF vs Invesco S&P 500 GARP ETF
Key differences
- SPGP costs 0.18% less per year.
- SPGP is significantly larger than MTRA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MTRA follows a active selection strategy; SPGP uses index tracking.
- SPGP has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MTRA | SPGP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.54% | 0.36% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $142M | $2.2B |
| Since | 2025 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.90% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +19.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +13.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +8.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.59 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 15.38% |
| Max drawdown | -15.77% | -42.08% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MTRA and SPGP
Explore further