Screener
MTRA vs GRPZ
Invesco International Growth Focus ETF vs Invesco S&P Smallcap 600 GARP ETF
Key differences
- GRPZ costs 0.19% less per year.
- MTRA is significantly larger than GRPZ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MTRA follows a active selection strategy; GRPZ uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| MTRA | GRPZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.54% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $142M | $3M |
| Since | 2025 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.90% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +27.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 17.85% |
| Max drawdown | -15.77% | -27.87% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MTRA and GRPZ
Explore further