Screener
MUSI vs ACSG
American Century Multisector Income ETF vs American Century Small Cap Growth Insights ETF
Key differences
- MUSI costs 0.11% less per year.
- MUSI is significantly larger than ACSG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MUSI is classified as fixed income, while ACSG is equity — different risk/return profiles.
Side-by-side comparison
| MUSI | ACSG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.38% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $214M | $15M |
| Since | 2021 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 5.74% | — |
| Asset class | fixed income | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +6.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.51 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.35% | — |
| Max drawdown | -13.91% | -13.28% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MUSI and ACSG
Explore further