Screener
MXI vs FMAT
iShares Global Materials ETF vs Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF
Key differences
- FMAT costs 0.31% less per year.
- MXI covers global markets; FMAT covers north america.
- Over the last 3 years, MXI has delivered higher annualized returns.
- MXI has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MXI | FMAT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.08% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $325M | $603M |
| Since | 2006 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 1.78% | 1.43% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +31.6% | +22.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +13.3% | +11.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.8% | +4.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.58 | 0.52 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.38% | 17.69% |
| Max drawdown | -39.52% | -41.11% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MXI and FMAT
Explore further