Screener
MXI vs ICOP
iShares Global Materials ETF vs iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF
Key differences
- MXI costs 0.08% less per year.
- MXI has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MXI | ICOP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.47% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $325M | $429M |
| Since | 2006 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 1.78% | 1.85% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +31.6% | +94.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +13.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.8% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.58 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.38% | 36.85% |
| Max drawdown | -39.52% | -38.67% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MXI and ICOP
Explore further