Screener
NANR vs SGDM
State Street SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF vs Sprott Gold Miners ETF
Key differences
- NANR costs 0.11% less per year.
- NANR is classified as alternative, while SGDM is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- NANR follows a index tracking strategy; SGDM uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, SGDM has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| NANR | SGDM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.46% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $795M | $660M |
| Since | 2015 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 1.45% | 1.01% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +53.9% | +66.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +19.1% | +38.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +16.6% | +18.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.81 | 0.97 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.21% | 44.78% |
| Max drawdown | -49.15% | -49.69% |
Similar to NANR and SGDM
Explore further