Screener
NANR vs GNR
State Street SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF
Key differences
- NANR costs 0.05% less per year.
- GNR is significantly larger than NANR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- NANR is classified as alternative, while GNR is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- NANR covers north america markets; GNR covers global.
- Over the last 3 years, NANR has delivered higher annualized returns.
- GNR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| NANR | GNR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $795M | $4.9B |
| Since | 2015 | 2010 |
| Dividend yield | 1.45% | 2.31% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +53.9% | +41.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +19.1% | +14.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +16.6% | +10.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.81 | 0.66 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.21% | 16.41% |
| Max drawdown | -49.15% | -48.59% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to NANR and GNR
Explore further