Screener
NATO vs CGMU
Themes Transatlantic Defense ETF vs Capital Group Municipal Income ETF
Key differences
- CGMU costs 0.08% less per year.
- CGMU is significantly larger than NATO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- NATO is classified as equity, while CGMU is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
Side-by-side comparison
| NATO | CGMU | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.27% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $99M | $5.8B |
| Since | 2024 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 0.45% | 3.35% |
| Asset class | equity | fixed income |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +23.3% | +6.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +4.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.31 |
| Volatility 1Y | 20.70% | 2.31% |
| Max drawdown | -15.99% | -4.10% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to NATO and CGMU
Explore further