Screener
NATO vs CGSD
Themes Transatlantic Defense ETF vs Capital Group Short Duration Income ETF
Key differences
- CGSD costs 0.10% less per year.
- CGSD is significantly larger than NATO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- NATO is classified as equity, while CGSD is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- NATO follows a index tracking strategy; CGSD uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| NATO | CGSD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $99M | $2.2B |
| Since | 2024 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 0.45% | 4.48% |
| Asset class | equity | fixed income |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +23.3% | +4.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +5.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.77 |
| Volatility 1Y | 20.70% | 1.47% |
| Max drawdown | -15.99% | -1.75% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to NATO and CGSD
Explore further