Screener
NATO vs SPDF
Themes Transatlantic Defense ETF vs Defender Risk Adaptive 500 ETF
Key differences
- NATO costs 0.34% less per year.
- NATO is significantly larger than SPDF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- NATO follows a index tracking strategy; SPDF uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| NATO | SPDF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.69% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $99M | $5M |
| Since | 2024 | 2026 |
| Dividend yield | 0.45% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +23.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 20.70% | — |
| Max drawdown | -15.99% | -1.90% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to NATO and SPDF
Explore further