Screener
NATO vs WINN
Themes Transatlantic Defense ETF vs Harbor Long-Term Growers ETF
Key differences
- NATO costs 0.22% less per year.
- WINN is significantly larger than NATO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- NATO follows a index tracking strategy; WINN uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| NATO | WINN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.57% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $99M | $1.1B |
| Since | 2024 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 0.45% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +23.3% | +23.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +24.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.01 |
| Volatility 1Y | 20.70% | 16.16% |
| Max drawdown | -15.99% | -32.08% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to NATO and WINN
Explore further