Screener
NBET vs ICLN
Neuberger Energy Transition & Infrastructure ETF vs iShares Global Clean Energy ETF
Key differences
- ICLN costs 0.26% less per year.
- ICLN is significantly larger than NBET — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, NBET has delivered higher annualized returns.
- ICLN has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| NBET | ICLN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $45M | $2.5B |
| Since | 2022 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 2.26% | 1.30% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.3% | +87.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.1% | +9.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +2.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.97 | 0.34 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.58% | 25.93% |
| Max drawdown | -18.72% | -66.75% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to NBET and ICLN
Explore further