Screener
NBET vs IXC
Neuberger Energy Transition & Infrastructure ETF vs iShares Global Energy ETF
Key differences
- IXC costs 0.25% less per year.
- IXC is significantly larger than NBET — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, NBET has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IXC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| NBET | IXC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $45M | $2.8B |
| Since | 2022 | 2001 |
| Dividend yield | 2.26% | 2.72% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.3% | +46.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.1% | +17.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +20.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.97 | 0.75 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.58% | 18.71% |
| Max drawdown | -18.72% | -64.16% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to NBET and IXC
Explore further