Screener
NBJP vs JCHI
Neuberger Japan Equity ETF vs JPMorgan Active China ETF
Key differences
Both NBJP and JCHI are equity ETFs. NBJP charges 0.50% a year and JCHI 0.65%. The main difference: NBJP follows a index tracking strategy; JCHI uses active selection.
- NBJP follows a index tracking strategy; JCHI uses active selection.
- NBJP covers the Asia-Pacific region; JCHI covers emerging markets.
- NBJP costs 0.15% less per year.
- NBJP is much larger than JCHI. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| NBJP | JCHI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $151M | $15M |
| Since | 2024 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 1.91% | 1.80% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +31.2% | +12.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +9.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.33 |
| Volatility 1Y | 20.00% | 17.85% |
| Max drawdown | -14.34% | -29.57% |
Similar to NBJP and JCHI
Explore further