Screener
NBJP vs JEMA
Neuberger Japan Equity ETF vs JPMorgan ActiveBuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF
Key differences
Both NBJP and JEMA are equity ETFs. NBJP charges 0.50% a year and JEMA 0.33%. The main difference: NBJP follows a index tracking strategy; JEMA uses active selection.
- NBJP follows a index tracking strategy; JEMA uses active selection.
- NBJP covers the Asia-Pacific region; JEMA covers emerging markets.
- JEMA costs 0.17% less per year.
- JEMA is much larger than NBJP. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| NBJP | JEMA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.33% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $151M | $1.7B |
| Since | 2024 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 1.91% | 2.27% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +31.2% | +48.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +22.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +5.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.99 |
| Volatility 1Y | 20.00% | 21.29% |
| Max drawdown | -14.34% | -39.50% |
Similar to NBJP and JEMA
Explore further