Screener
NBJP vs JIRE
Neuberger Japan Equity ETF vs JPMorgan International Research Enhanced Equity ETF
Key differences
Both NBJP and JIRE are equity ETFs. NBJP charges 0.50% a year and JIRE 0.24%. The main difference: NBJP follows a index tracking strategy; JIRE uses active selection.
- NBJP follows a index tracking strategy; JIRE uses active selection.
- NBJP covers the Asia-Pacific region; JIRE covers global markets.
- JIRE costs 0.26% less per year.
- JIRE is much larger than NBJP. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- JIRE has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| NBJP | JIRE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.24% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $151M | $10.9B |
| Since | 2024 | 1992 |
| Dividend yield | 1.91% | 2.76% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +31.2% | +17.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +16.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.84 |
| Volatility 1Y | 20.00% | 15.74% |
| Max drawdown | -14.34% | -16.11% |
Similar to NBJP and JIRE
Explore further