Screener
NBJP vs JIVE
Neuberger Japan Equity ETF vs Jpmorgan International Value ETF
Key differences
Both NBJP and JIVE are equity ETFs. NBJP charges 0.50% a year and JIVE 0.55%. The main difference: NBJP follows a index tracking strategy; JIVE uses active selection.
- NBJP follows a index tracking strategy; JIVE uses active selection.
- NBJP covers the Asia-Pacific region; JIVE covers global markets.
- NBJP costs 0.05% less per year.
- JIVE is much larger than NBJP. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| NBJP | JIVE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $151M | $2.8B |
| Since | 2024 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 1.91% | 1.97% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +31.2% | +38.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 20.00% | 14.78% |
| Max drawdown | -14.34% | -13.79% |
Similar to NBJP and JIVE
Explore further