Screener
NBSD vs IWMI
Neuberger Short Duration Income ETF vs NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF
Key differences
NBSD is a fixed income ETF, while IWMI is an alternative ETF. NBSD charges 0.35% a year and IWMI 0.68%.
- NBSD is a fixed income fund, while IWMI is an alternative fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- NBSD follows a active selection strategy; IWMI uses option income.
- NBSD covers global markets excluding the US; IWMI covers North America.
- NBSD costs 0.33% less per year.
- NBSD has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| NBSD | IWMI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.68% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.1B | $909M |
| Since | 2010 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 4.81% | 1.71% |
| Asset class | fixed income | alternative |
| Region | global ex us | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.5% | +34.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 1.43% | 15.35% |
| Max drawdown | -2.63% | -23.88% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.