Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

NBSM vs SCZ

Neuberger Small-Mid Cap ETF vs iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF

NBSM

Neuberger Small-Mid Cap ETF

Annual cost

0.65%

Fund size

$226M

SCZ

iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF

Annual cost

0.40%

Fund size

$14.9B

Key differences

Both NBSM and SCZ are equity ETFs. NBSM charges 0.65% a year and SCZ 0.40%. The main difference: NBSM follows a active selection strategy; SCZ uses index tracking.

  • NBSM follows a active selection strategy; SCZ uses index tracking.
  • NBSM covers North America; SCZ covers global markets excluding the US.
  • SCZ costs 0.25% less per year.
  • SCZ is much larger than NBSM. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • SCZ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

NBSMSCZ
Annual cost (TER)0.65%0.40%
Fund size (AUM)$226M$14.9B
Since20242007
Dividend yield0.38%2.95%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth americaglobal ex us
Strategyactive selectionindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+8.5%+21.2%
CAGR 3YN/A+16.6%
CAGR 5YN/A+4.9%
Sharpe 3YN/A0.85
Volatility 1Y14.92%14.68%
Max drawdown-25.16%-41.07%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to NBSM and SCZ