Skip to content
Screener

NDAA vs AOA

Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF vs iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF

NDAA

Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF

Annual cost

0.65%

Fund size

$5M

AOA

iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF

Annual cost

0.15%

Fund size

$3.2B

Key differences

NDAA is an alternative ETF, while AOA is a mixed asset ETF. NDAA charges 0.65% a year and AOA 0.15%.

  • NDAA is an alternative fund, while AOA is a mixed asset fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
  • NDAA follows a tactical allocation strategy; AOA uses index tracking.
  • AOA costs 0.50% less per year.
  • AOA is much larger than NDAA. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • AOA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

NDAAAOA
Annual cost (TER)0.65%0.15%
Fund size (AUM)$5M$3.2B
Since20242008
Dividend yield2.44%2.05%
Asset classalternativemixed asset
Regionnorth america
Strategytactical allocationindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+22.4%+21.9%
CAGR 3YN/A+17.2%
CAGR 5YN/A+8.9%
Sharpe 3YN/A1.11
Volatility 1Y11.20%11.15%
Max drawdown-13.50%-28.38%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to NDAA and AOA