Screener
NEAR vs CMBS
iShares Short Duration Bond Active ETF vs iShares CMBS ETF
Key differences
- NEAR is significantly larger than CMBS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- NEAR follows a active selection strategy; CMBS uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| NEAR | CMBS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $4.3B | $481M |
| Since | 2013 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 4.48% | 3.52% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.4% | +4.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +5.6% | +4.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.8% | +0.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.18 | 0.30 |
| Volatility 1Y | 1.37% | 3.64% |
| Max drawdown | -9.61% | -15.87% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to NEAR and CMBS
Explore further